← Back to all organisations

Housing Finance Agency

219 spending records on file.

Transparency Score

2.1/5

42% transparent

Machine readable 0.0/1

Descriptions 1.0/1

Uniqueness 0.1/1

Supplier number 0.0/1

Supplier name 1.0/1

Help improve transparency

Payment date^*	Supplier	Description	Kind	Publication	Amount
12 Jun 2015	Jones Lang LaSalle	Rent-related charges	Purchase Order	Q2 2015	€56,112.01
24 Apr 2015	KPMG	Audit fees	Purchase Order	Q2 2015	€29,870.00
09 Mar 2015	Jones Lang LaSalle	Rent-related charges	Purchase Order	Q1 2015	€44,950.68
23 Jan 2015	NTMA	Service fees	Purchase Order	Q1 2015	€253,897.71
12 Dec 2014	Jones Lang LaSalle	Rent-related charges	Purchase Order	Q4 2014	€46,013.39
18 Sep 2014	Capita IB Solutions Ireland	IT contractor services	Purchase Order	Q3 2014	€51,936.75
11 Sep 2014	Jones Lang LaSalle	Rent-related charges	Purchase Order	Q3 2014	€38,130.00
19 Jun 2014	Jones Lang LaSalle	Rent-related charges	Purchase Order	Q2 2014	€43,585.75
07 May 2014	Jones Lang LaSalle	Rent-related charges	Purchase Order	Q2 2014	€255,040.00
24 Apr 2014	KPMG	Audit fees	Purchase Order	Q2 2014	€29,870.00
21 Mar 2014	NTMA	Service fees	Purchase Order	Q1 2014	€252,634.53
20 Jan 2014	McCann FitzGerald Solicitors	Legal services	Purchase Order	Q1 2014	€28,115.98
02 Aug 2013	Mc Cann Fitz Gerald Solicitors	Legal services	Purchase Order	Q3 2013	€23,771.12
10 May 2013	Lancast	IT hardware	Purchase Order	Q2 2013	€23,347.39
19 Apr 2013	KPMG	Audit fees	Purchase Order	Q2 2013	€24,061.57
12 Apr 2013	NTMA	Service fees	Purchase Order	Q2 2013	€248,411.54
14 Feb 2013	Jones Lang LaSalle	Rent-related charges	Purchase Order	Q1 2013	€50,000.00
22 Nov 2012	Moody's Investors Service	Annual rating fees	Purchase Order	Q4 2012	€42,000.00
19 Oct 2012	Marsh Financial Services	MPI scheme costs	Purchase Order	Q4 2012	€35,000.00

^* Payment date may be the end of the reporting quarter when the entity does not publish an exact date.

How to read these figures

These are reported values from published purchase order and payment records — not verified cash paid, and not total spending by this organisation. A row may be a purchase order, a payment, or another reported transaction; the source files often do not say which.

Coverage and quality vary. Some fields are blank, supplier names are free text (the same firm can appear under many labels), and descriptions are inconsistent rather than a controlled taxonomy. An amount alone says nothing about value for money and it may or may not include VAT.

Records are retrieved from each organisation’s published files such as spreadsheets, PDFs, and other formats of uneven quality. Extraction techniques (including automated parsing) can introduce gaps, misreads, or incomplete rows when source layout or quality is poor. Treat the data as a starting point for investigation, not a definitive ledger.

Here is a project that encountered similar issues

Housing Finance Agency

Transparency Score

Spending per quarter