Purchase Orders Over €20,000 2021 (Q1–Q4 combined)

Spending records

Payment date^*	Supplier	Description	Kind	Amount
31 Dec 2021	PJ BRENNAN & COMPANY LTD	Purchase order over €20,000	Purchase Order	€48,480.00
31 Dec 2021	METRICON CORP	Purchase order over €20,000	Purchase Order	€25,200.00
31 Dec 2021	MASON TECHNOLOGY	Purchase order over €20,000	Purchase Order	€126,760.00
31 Dec 2021	FANNIN LTD	Purchase order over €20,000	Purchase Order	€31,998.00
31 Dec 2021	FARRELL BROTHERS (ARDEE) LTD.	Purchase order over €20,000	Purchase Order	€51,464.00
31 Dec 2021	IMEX INSTRUMENTS LTD	Purchase order over €20,000	Purchase Order	€137,304.00
31 Dec 2021	FARRELL BROTHERS (ARDEE) LTD.	Purchase order over €20,000	Purchase Order	€36,051.00
31 Dec 2021	FARRELL BROTHERS (ARDEE) LTD.	Purchase order over €20,000	Purchase Order	€344,798.00
31 Dec 2021	DELL COMPUTER CORPORATION (IRL)	Purchase order over €20,000	Purchase Order	€24,400.00
31 Dec 2021	BIBLIOTHECA LTD.	Purchase order over €20,000	Purchase Order	€66,398.00
31 Dec 2021	KBR FOODSERVICE EQUIPMENT LTD.	Purchase order over €20,000	Purchase Order	€35,625.00

^* Payment date may be the end of the reporting quarter when the entity does not publish an exact date.

How to read these figures

These are reported values from published purchase order and payment records — not verified cash paid, and not total spending by this organisation. A row may be a purchase order, a payment, or another reported transaction; the source files often do not say which.

Coverage and quality vary. Some fields are blank, supplier names are free text (the same firm can appear under many labels), and descriptions are inconsistent rather than a controlled taxonomy. An amount alone says nothing about value for money and it may or may not include VAT.

Records are retrieved from each organisation’s published files such as spreadsheets, PDFs, and other formats of uneven quality. Extraction techniques (including automated parsing) can introduce gaps, misreads, or incomplete rows when source layout or quality is poor. Treat the data as a starting point for investigation, not a definitive ledger.

Here is a project that encountered similar issues