Purchase Orders Over €20,000 Q1 2014

Spending records

Payment date^*	Supplier	Description	Kind	Amount
31 Mar 2014	Winroy Limited	Furniture TH22	Purchase Order	€22,831.00
31 Mar 2014	Shaffrey Associates Architects	1 Crane St & 7&8 Thomas St	Purchase Order	€23,154.00
31 Mar 2014	Acacia Facilities Management	H&S Essential works	Purchase Order	€30,412.00
31 Mar 2014	Falling for Friends	Professional Services 2014	Purchase Order	€32,103.00
31 Mar 2014	DHR Communications Ltd	Public Relations work - 6 months	Purchase Order	€44,865.00
31 Mar 2014	Acacia Facilities Management	H&S Officer	Purchase Order	€45,354.00
31 Mar 2014	Acacia Facilities Management	Unscheduled works/callouts 2014	Purchase Order	€49,200.00
31 Mar 2014	Acacia Facilities Management	Security of Derelict Sites 2014	Purchase Order	€58,531.00
31 Mar 2014	Acacia Facilities Management	Project Management Derelict Sites 2014	Purchase Order	€64,078.00
31 Mar 2014	Acacia Facilities Management	Administrative assistance 2014	Purchase Order	€172,306.00
31 Mar 2014	Dublin City Council	Rates 2014	Purchase Order	€199,072.00
31 Mar 2014	Acacia Facilities Management	Facility Management for yr 2014	Purchase Order	€816,114.00

^* Payment date may be the end of the reporting quarter when the entity does not publish an exact date.

How to read these figures

These are reported values from published purchase order and payment records — not verified cash paid, and not total spending by this organisation. A row may be a purchase order, a payment, or another reported transaction; the source files often do not say which.

Coverage and quality vary. Some fields are blank, supplier names are free text (the same firm can appear under many labels), and descriptions are inconsistent rather than a controlled taxonomy. An amount alone says nothing about value for money and it may or may not include VAT.

Records are retrieved from each organisation’s published files such as spreadsheets, PDFs, and other formats of uneven quality. Extraction techniques (including automated parsing) can introduce gaps, misreads, or incomplete rows when source layout or quality is poor. Treat the data as a starting point for investigation, not a definitive ledger.

Here is a project that encountered similar issues