Payments over €20,000 Q4 2016

Spending records

Payment date^*	Supplier	Kind	Amount
21 Oct 2016	DOMINIC FAGAN FCA	Purchase Order	€40,000.00
21 Oct 2016	BRAY FAMILY RESOURCE&DEVELOPMENT PROJECT	Purchase Order	€32,353.50
21 Oct 2016	DRUG EDUCATION WORKERS PROJECT	Purchase Order	€28,099.75
21 Oct 2016	CROSS CARE	Purchase Order	€24,926.50
21 Oct 2016	PRECISION CONSTRUCTION LIMITED	Purchase Order	€24,032.30
14 Oct 2016	COADY PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS	Purchase Order	€241,596.02
14 Oct 2016	ACTAVO BUILDING MANUFACTURING LTD	Purchase Order	€111,678.68
14 Oct 2016	CLARINGTON PROPERTIES LTD	Purchase Order	€55,750.00
14 Oct 2016	KBR FOODSERVICES EQUIPMENT LTD	Purchase Order	€30,712.10
07 Oct 2016	K & J TOWNMORE CONSTRUCTION LTD	Purchase Order	€95,013.66
07 Oct 2016	HENOTEE LTD	Purchase Order	€62,730.00
07 Oct 2016	JUNGHEINRICH LIFT TRUCK LIMITED	Purchase Order	€30,442.50

^* Payment date may be the end of the reporting quarter when the entity does not publish an exact date.

How to read these figures

These are reported values from published purchase order and payment records — not verified cash paid, and not total spending by this organisation. A row may be a purchase order, a payment, or another reported transaction; the source files often do not say which.

Coverage and quality vary. Some fields are blank, supplier names are free text (the same firm can appear under many labels), and descriptions are inconsistent rather than a controlled taxonomy. An amount alone says nothing about value for money and it may or may not include VAT.

Records are retrieved from each organisation’s published files such as spreadsheets, PDFs, and other formats of uneven quality. Extraction techniques (including automated parsing) can introduce gaps, misreads, or incomplete rows when source layout or quality is poor. Treat the data as a starting point for investigation, not a definitive ledger.

Here is a project that encountered similar issues