Payments over €20,000 Q1 2019

Spending records

Payment date^*	Supplier	Description	Kind	Amount
31 Mar 2019	Arthur Cox	General legal fees Y	Purchase Order	€34,876.18
31 Mar 2019	Arthur Cox	Circuit Court appeal fees Y	Purchase Order	€22,197.20
31 Mar 2019	Version 1	IT specialised support Q1 and Q2 2019 Y	Purchase Order	€23,308.50
31 Mar 2019	Connexus Recruit Ltd	Recruitment campaigns Y	Purchase Order	€45,663.75
31 Mar 2019	Office of Public Works	Rent Q2 2019 Y	Purchase Order	€112,291.04
31 Mar 2019	Capita	Maintenance charge Q2 Y	Purchase Order	€25,368.75
31 Mar 2019	Dept of Justice Equity & Law Reform	HR Q1 Y	Purchase Order	€38,000.00
31 Mar 2019	Capita	IT general support Y	Purchase Order	€23,724.90
31 Mar 2019	Dept of Justice Equity & Law Reform	HR Q4 2018 Y	Purchase Order	€37,703.31
31 Mar 2019	Health Information & Quality Authority	Adult Safeguarding costs 50% Y	Purchase Order	€39,287.50

^* Payment date may be the end of the reporting quarter when the entity does not publish an exact date.

How to read these figures

These are reported values from published purchase order and payment records — not verified cash paid, and not total spending by this organisation. A row may be a purchase order, a payment, or another reported transaction; the source files often do not say which.

Coverage and quality vary. Some fields are blank, supplier names are free text (the same firm can appear under many labels), and descriptions are inconsistent rather than a controlled taxonomy. An amount alone says nothing about value for money and it may or may not include VAT.

Records are retrieved from each organisation’s published files such as spreadsheets, PDFs, and other formats of uneven quality. Extraction techniques (including automated parsing) can introduce gaps, misreads, or incomplete rows when source layout or quality is poor. Treat the data as a starting point for investigation, not a definitive ledger.

Here is a project that encountered similar issues