Payments over €20,000 2015

Spending records

Payment date^*	Supplier	Description	Kind	Amount
31 Dec 2015	I3 Digital	Publication of the Primary Language Curriculum (English and Irish) for junior infants to second class on www.curriculumonline.ie	Purchase Order	€75,000.00
31 Dec 2015	I3 Digital	Development of a template the Curriculum Online website including content migration	Purchase Order	€31,723.00
31 Dec 2015	Digilogue	Update to Level 2 e-Planning Tool	Purchase Order	€22,632.00
31 Dec 2015	Inspired Software & Services Ltd	Migration of user profiles from onsite premise to Azure active directory	Purchase Order	€22,500.00
31 Dec 2015	Principle Design Consultants	Artwork, print and mailing of assessment materials in Irish and English to all post primary schools	Purchase Order	€35,842.00
31 Dec 2015	Digilogue	Update to Level 2 e-Planning Tool	Purchase Order	€25,114.00
31 Dec 2015	Wriggle	Purchase of 22 Microsoft Surfaces Pro 4	Purchase Order	€32,621.00

^* Payment date may be the end of the reporting quarter when the entity does not publish an exact date.

How to read these figures

These are reported values from published purchase order and payment records — not verified cash paid, and not total spending by this organisation. A row may be a purchase order, a payment, or another reported transaction; the source files often do not say which.

Coverage and quality vary. Some fields are blank, supplier names are free text (the same firm can appear under many labels), and descriptions are inconsistent rather than a controlled taxonomy. An amount alone says nothing about value for money and it may or may not include VAT.

Records are retrieved from each organisation’s published files such as spreadsheets, PDFs, and other formats of uneven quality. Extraction techniques (including automated parsing) can introduce gaps, misreads, or incomplete rows when source layout or quality is poor. Treat the data as a starting point for investigation, not a definitive ledger.

Here is a project that encountered similar issues