Payments/POs over €20,000 Q4 2018

Spending records

Payment date^*	Supplier	Kind	Amount
31 Dec 2018	Lex Consultancy	Purchase Order	€22,617.16
31 Dec 2018	Argosy Books Limited	Purchase Order	€26,660.50
31 Dec 2018	Indecon	Purchase Order	€29,467.72
31 Dec 2018	Bord Gáis	Purchase Order	€40,841.11
31 Dec 2018	Focal Media	Purchase Order	€41,232.15
31 Dec 2018	Hays Recruiting	Purchase Order	€42,073.13
31 Dec 2018	OMD	Purchase Order	€52,417.44
31 Dec 2018	Momart	Purchase Order	€56,325.50
31 Dec 2018	Brambles Deli Café Ltd	Purchase Order	€56,624.79
31 Dec 2018	Morgan McKinley	Purchase Order	€59,787.09
31 Dec 2018	Moore Cleaning Services	Purchase Order	€73,245.88
31 Dec 2018	Noonan Security Services	Purchase Order	€135,912.48
31 Dec 2018	Electric Ireland	Purchase Order	€150,767.50
31 Dec 2018	GHL Recruitment	Purchase Order	€164,564.20

^* Payment date may be the end of the reporting quarter when the entity does not publish an exact date.

How to read these figures

These are reported values from published purchase order and payment records — not verified cash paid, and not total spending by this organisation. A row may be a purchase order, a payment, or another reported transaction; the source files often do not say which.

Coverage and quality vary. Some fields are blank, supplier names are free text (the same firm can appear under many labels), and descriptions are inconsistent rather than a controlled taxonomy. An amount alone says nothing about value for money and it may or may not include VAT.

Records are retrieved from each organisation’s published files such as spreadsheets, PDFs, and other formats of uneven quality. Extraction techniques (including automated parsing) can introduce gaps, misreads, or incomplete rows when source layout or quality is poor. Treat the data as a starting point for investigation, not a definitive ledger.

Here is a project that encountered similar issues