Purchase Orders Over €20,000 Q1 2014

Spending records

Payment date^*	Supplier	Description	Kind	Amount
19 Dec 2014	RPA	SIDS Refund	Purchase Order	€68,048.00
17 Dec 2014	PWC	IT Consultancy	Purchase Order	€18,475.63
15 Dec 2014	Kildare Co Co	SIDS Refund	Purchase Order	€33,662.00
10 Dec 2014	CIE	SIDS Refund	Purchase Order	€27,447.00
02 Dec 2014	PWC	IT Consultancy	Purchase Order	€43,710.63
18 Nov 2014	Eirgrid	SIDS Refund	Purchase Order	€22,008.00
10 Nov 2014	Donegal Co Co	SIDS Refund	Purchase Order	€24,278.00
10 Nov 2014	Eirgrid	SIDS Refund	Purchase Order	€23,451.00
10 Nov 2014	Greenwind	SIDS Refund	Purchase Order	€31,050.00
23 Oct 2014	Trilogy	IT MaintenanceY	Purchase Order	€46,942.18
15 Oct 2014	Media Vest	Public Notices	Purchase Order	€33,336.85
13 Oct 2014	GG&MA	Rent	Purchase Order	€315,290.75
14 Jul 2014	Gannon Anglim Partnership	Rent Jul-Sept	Purchase Order	€315,290.75
27 May 2014	Mallon Technology 34116	ICT Scanning & Geo referencing	Purchase Order	€21,563.82
23 Apr 2014	Micromail	IT Software	Purchase Order	€28,360.24
31 Mar 2014	Gannon Anglim Partnership	Rent Payment	Purchase Order	€315,290.75
24 Mar 2014	Dublin Airport Authority 33967	SIDS/ LAPS Refund	Purchase Order	€59,275.00

^* Payment date may be the end of the reporting quarter when the entity does not publish an exact date.

How to read these figures

These are reported values from published purchase order and payment records — not verified cash paid, and not total spending by this organisation. A row may be a purchase order, a payment, or another reported transaction; the source files often do not say which.

Coverage and quality vary. Some fields are blank, supplier names are free text (the same firm can appear under many labels), and descriptions are inconsistent rather than a controlled taxonomy. An amount alone says nothing about value for money and it may or may not include VAT.

Records are retrieved from each organisation’s published files such as spreadsheets, PDFs, and other formats of uneven quality. Extraction techniques (including automated parsing) can introduce gaps, misreads, or incomplete rows when source layout or quality is poor. Treat the data as a starting point for investigation, not a definitive ledger.

Here is a project that encountered similar issues